Fourth Quarter of 2023
Release Date: December 13, 2023
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, when you transitioned the state of an Inspection to the Draft state, the Inspection was not unlocked. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you transition from any state to the Draft state, the Inspection is unlocked. | US601217 |
|
Previously, in the Inspection Confidence section of Full Inspection, if you added a new record in the bulk data form, then navigated to a different APM tab without saving the record, and then returned to the Inspection tab, the unsaved record was displayed twice in the bulk data form. This issue has been resolved. | DE209154 |
|
Previously, when you attempted to create an inspection and an error occurred from rules, the error message did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | DE208219 |
| Previously, after accessing the Inspection Confidence Evaluation section in the Inspection Overview page, if you switched between multiple tabs, and then generated Inspection Confidence Evaluation records, the generated records did not appear in the list. This issue has been resolved. | DE207112 |
| Previously, while viewing an image which was referenced as an URL, an “Invalid URL” error appeared. This has been resolved. Now, you can view images which are referenced as URLs. | DE205167 |
|
Previously, Inspection Health Evaluation was displayed as a configurable family in the Event Configurations page, This issue has been resolved. | DE175261 |
|
Previously, the Generate Report button was enabled in the Inspection Tasks section for the MI Inspection Viewer Group. This issue has been resolved. | DE170865 |
Release Date: October 6, 2023
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Performance has been enhanced when deleting records from the Inspections, Tasks, or Work Packs sections of the Inspection Management Overview page. | US600736 |
To enhance usability, the Next Date for Inspection Task can now be populated optionally based on the TM Remaining Life from Thickness Monitoring module. To facilitate this enhancement, the following fields have been added to the Inspection task datasheet:
Note:
After you enable the Consider TM Remaining Life check box and save the record, the Next Date field will be populated based on the most conservative value between Desired Interval and the calculated TM Remaining Life. If Next Date is calculated using TM Remaining Life, then Next Date Basis will be populated as Overridden By TM Remaining Life. However, if Next Date is calculated using Desired Interval, then Next Date Basis will be populated as Desired Interval. | US588914 |
| To enhance usability, you can now upload an Inspection Scope Visualization Document for an individual Inspection. To facilitate this enhancement, a new section, Inspection Scope Visualization, has been added and can be accessed by selecting the Scope tab of an Inspection within the Inspection Management module. | US582350 |
| To enhance usability, you can now determine Susceptibility Type of a Component from Inspection History. To facilitate this enhancement, a new field, Cracking Detected?, has been added to the Inspection Confidence Evaluation family. You can access this field from the Inspection Confidence section of an Inspection. When Inspections are linked to RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluation or RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluation, if Cracking Detected?, is selected for any of the linked Inspections, the Susceptibility Type will be set to Detected. | US569500 |
| To enhance usability, you can now auto generate Inspection Confidence Evaluation records for RBI Components on an Inspection. To facilitate this enhancement, a new button Generate has been added and can be accessed by selecting the Inspection Confidence tab in the Inspection workspace. | US577958 |
To enhance usability, you can now load a Checklist Finding using the following Data Loaders:
| US570072 |
| To enhance usability, only effective Inspections will now be considered for RBI 581 Degradation Mechanism Evaluations. To facilitate this enhancement, Inspections with Ineffective confidence will not be considered when setting the Last Known Inspection Date field for RBI 581 Degradation Mechanism Evaluations. | US569635 |
| To enhance usability, you can now determine Thinning Type of the Component from Inspection History. To facilitate this enhancement, a new field Thinning Type has been added to Inspection Confidence Evaluation family and can be accessed from Inspection Confidence Evaluation tab in the Inspection. Note: When the Inspections are linked to an RBI 581 Thinning and Lining, RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation or Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. DME, Thinning Type from the latest Inspection is mapped to the DME. | US569497 |
To enhance usability, PRD Pop Test Checklist now supports multiple Degradation Mechanisms. To facilitate this enhancement, Inspection Confidence Evaluations has been enabled for PRD Pop Test Checklist and can be accessed from Inspection Confidence tab in the Inspection workspace. PRD Pop Test Checklist datasheet has been updated and the following fields have been removed from the datasheet:
|
|
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, in the Inspection Profile record, when you entered values with single quote for the RBI Component field, the validation failed, and the record was not updated. This issue has been resolved. | DE205320 |
| Previously, if you had included a Boolean field in an Offline Form, after you downloaded an Inspection in Inspection Field Data Collection, you could not select or clear the check box corresponding to the Boolean field. This issue has been resolved. | DE203654 |
| Previously, if you updated the state of an Inspection when there were unsaved changes, the state was updated, but the unsaved data was lost. This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, a message appears indicating that there are unsaved changes, and you can update the data and change the state. | DE200656 |
| Previously, if the Asset ID was long, Inspection Group hyperlink was not displayed correctly within an Inspection. This issue has been resolved. | DE198484 |
| Previously, in the Event Configurations section of the Inspection Management application settings, while reviewing the Related Families for the Checklist Inspection Template family, the Offline option was selected for each of the three configured related families. However, the Offline option for these families was not intended to be enabled, and in the Integrity Mobile app, this prevented Checklist Findings from displaying. This issue has been resolved. | DE198088 |
| Previously, when a Risk Analyst reviewed the Inspection Confidence record in the Inspection Confidence section, the Risk Analyst name displayed was overlapping. This issue has been resolved. | DE196413 |
| Previously, when loading new Inspection Confidence Evaluation records using the Inspection Data Loader, if a value was specified in the RBI Component field, the field was not set properly. This issue has been resolved. | DE166452 |