| Previously, in the Risk Based Inspection module, if you used a family (parent or child) other than the baseline Functional Location family to denote a functional location, the Asset Summary page appeared as if the functional location were an asset. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Risk Based Inspection Overview page appears as expected. | DE84510 |
| Previously, in the Asset Hierarchy Configuration page, if you used a family (parent or child) other than the baseline Functional Location family to denote a functional location, in the Integrity section, an incorrect hyperlink appeared, behaving as if the functional location were an asset. Also, the number of linked records in the Asset Hierarchy page was incorrect. This issue has been resolved. | DE84510 |
| Previously, the value in the Recommended Inspection Interval field was incorrect in the LC71 and LC72 Inspection Strategies. This issue has been resolved. Now, the value has been correctly updated to 180 months. | DE84263 |
Previously, the values in the Inspection Confidence, Inspection Extent, and Recommended Inspection Scope fields were incorrect in the following Inspection Strategies:- LC49
- LC491
- LC50
- LC501
- LC51
- LC511
- LC54
- LC541
- LC55
- LC551
- LC56
- LC561
This issue has been resolved. Now, the values in the Inspection Confidence and Inspection Extent fields have been correctly updated as follows:
| Inspection Strategy IDs | Inspection Confidence | Inspection Extent |
|---|
| LC49, LC491, LC50, LC501 | Medium | UT shear wave 50% of all potential locations | | LC51, LC511 | Medium | MT or PT 25% of all potential locations | | LC54, LC541, LC55, LC551 | Low | UT shear wave 25% of all potential locations | | LC56, LC561 | Low | MT or PT 10% of all potential locations |
The Recommended Inspection Scope for all these Inspection Strategies has been updated according to the updated Inspection Confidence and Inspection Extent values. | DE84166 |
| Previously, when you created an analysis where the value in the Design Temperature field was zero and the Stress Lookup Table was Piping or Pressure Vessel, the Allowable Stress field was blank, although the other stress input fields contained valid values. This issue has been resolved. | DE84129 |
Previously, the values in the Recommended Inspection Interval, Inspection Confidence, and Inspection Extent fields were incorrect in the LC59 Inspection Strategy record. This issue has been resolved. Now, the values have been correctly updated as follows:- Recommended Inspection Interval: 180 months
- Inspection Confidence: Low
- Inspection Extent: UT shear wave 25% of all potential locations
| DE83854 |
| Previously, the value in the Recommended Inspection Interval field was incorrect in the LC42 Inspection Strategy. This issue has been resolved. Now, the value has been correctly updated to 240 months. | DE83615 |
Previously, in the RBI Asset Summary and RBI Unit Summary pages, when you tried to delete an RBI component that had related records linked to it, the Delete button ( ) was disabled. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Delete button () is enabled, and, if you try to delete a component with related records, an error message appears, stating that you cannot. | DE82415 |
| Previously, when you copied an RBI Analysis that had a linked Criticality Other Damage Mechanism (Qualitative DM), the DF field was incorrectly set to null. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Probability Category field will be validated for Criticality Other Damage Mechanisms. | DE82369 |
Previously, when you accessed the No Recommendations section in the Risk Based Inspection Overview page, an error occurred in the following scenarios:- You had an active RBI 580 license but not an RBI 581 license.
- You had an active RBI 581 license but not an RBI 580 license.
This issue has been resolved. | DE82358 |
| Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 analysis that has a Ferritic Component Atmospheric Corrosion Degradation Mechanism, if the value in the Selected Corrosion Rate field was set to Estimated and the value in the Base Material Estimated Rate field was blank, an invalid error message appeared, stating that the Field Base Material Calculated Corrosion Rate was required. This issue has been resolved. The field caption for the MI_RBDEMEEV_BM_EST_RT_N field is now Estimated Rate. | DE82230 |
| Previously, when viewing the Inspection History for a DM that was related to an RBI Analysis, if you tried to unlink a locked Inspection from the DM, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | DE82226 |
| Previously, you could not promote an asset to ASM although you were a member of the MI Mechanical Integrity Power role. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the MI ASM Analyst security group has been added to the MI Mechanical Integrity Power role. | DE81525 |
| Previously, you could calculate an analysis only if the Design Temperature of the component was greater than or equal to the Operating Temperature. The behavior was the same for both positive and negative values in the temperature fields. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the value in Design Temperature field is less than zero, you can calculate the analysis with any value in the Operating Temperature field. Similarly, you could calculate an analysis only if the Design Pressure of the component was greater than or equal to the Operating Pressure. The behavior was the same for both positive and negative values in the pressure fields. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the value in the Design Pressure field is less than zero, you can calculate the analysis with any value in the Operating Pressure field. | DE81272 |
Previously, if you were using an Oracle database, the values in the following fields were sometimes set incorrectly:- DF field for Internal Corrosion DME
- Corrosion Factor field for External Corrosion DME
This issue has been resolved. | DE80441 |
) to access the RBI component in the Asset Summary page. Additionally, if you are viewing the RBI Component from the Asset Summary page, you can use the More button (