Third Quarter of 2019
Risk Based Inspection (RBI)
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on the dates listed below.
RBI 580 and RBI 581
Release Date: September 27, 2019
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Security Users who were members of the MI RBI Analyst Security Group are now automatically assigned the MI Inspection Plan Approver Role. | US360378 | ||||||||||
To enhance usability when superseding RBI Recommendations, the Completion Comments box has now been added to the RBI Recommendation datasheet. | US358589 | ||||||||||
You can now re-promote an asset from Risk Based Inspection (RBI) to Asset Strategy Manager (ASM) when the asset has been previously promoted to ASM and the resulting actions have been consolidated on the Asset Strategy. To facilitate this enhancement, any consolidated actions on the Asset Strategy will now be unlinked during the promotion of an asset. | US353336 | ||||||||||
To enhance usability and readability, the Process Unit navigation in the RBI 581 Inventory Groups workspace has been updated to display the Functional Location Entity ID instead of the Functional Location ID. | US348279 | ||||||||||
To enhance performance, the queries used in the Risk Based Inspection Overview page, which referenced MI_ENTITIES directly, now reference the Equipment family. To facilitate this enhancement, the following queries have been updated:
| US343930 | ||||||||||
You can now implement RBI recommendations that belong to an Inspection Plan in:
| US335134 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, for a Criticality RBI Component - Exchanger Bundle, when you copied an RBI Criticality Analysis or created a What-If Analysis from an RBI Criticality Analysis, and then calculated the analysis, the Final Phase and Final Phase Shell Side fields in the related Criticality Consequence Evaluation record were not populated. This issue has been resolved. | DE117340 |
Previously, the value in the Desired Interval field in an Inspection Task was recalculated when the related RBI Recommendation was either deleted or transitioned to the Archived state. This issue has been resolved. | DE117062 |
Previously, when calculating inventory for the Criticality RBI Component – Cylindrical Shell component that contained the value Storage Tank in the Component Type field, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Calculated Inventory field is populated with the correct inventory value. | DE100794 |
Previously, when you attempted to finalize risk of multiple analyses that belonged to multiple Assets or Corrosion Loops, the operation failed completely when there were multiple analyses that belonged to a single component. This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, the analyses that belong to different components are updated to Risk Completed and an error message appears to indicate the number of failed analyses. | DE95713 |
Previously, you could unexpectedly modify unmitigated risk values on Failure Risks with a source of RBI in Asset Strategy Manager (ASM). This issue has been resolved. | DE83069 |
Release Date: July 26, 2019
Description | Tracking ID(s) |
---|---|
Previously, when you applied a Criticality RBI Component – Cylindrical Shell component that contained the value Storage Tank in the Component Type box, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | DE113179 |
RBI 580
Release Date: September 27, 2019
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To enhance usability of the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader, the following values are now updated in the Interface Log record generated by the data loader:
| US366675 | ||||||||
To enhance usability, in the RBI Recommendation, the value in the RBI Recommendation Methodology field has been changed from Criticality Calculator to RBI 580. | US353694 | ||||||||
To enhance usability when using a UOM conversion set, the values within numeric fields are rounded off according to the type of the numeric field as follows:
| US352458 | ||||||||
The properties of the following representative fluids that are valid for RBI Criticality Analysis have been updated as per the API 581, 3rd Edition, Addendum 1 specification:
| US349921 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, if the Override Minimum Required Thickness check box was selected for an RBI Criticality Analysis, the value specified in the Specified Tmin box was not considered while calculating the Estimated Half-Life for the Criticality Calculator External Corrosion Degradation Mechanism Evaluation. This issue has been resolved. | DE117296 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader template, in the Consequence_Evaluation worksheet, the Consequence field contained the default value RBI. Due to this, an error occurred when importing data using the data loader. Now, the default value in the Consequence field has been changed to RBI Consequence. Note: The error message that appears when importing data using the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader that contains an invalid value in the Consequence field has now been updated to include the invalid value and the associated Analysis ID. | DE111087 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in Criticality Calculator RBI Components, the value in the Calculated Inventory field was rounded off to the nearest whole number. Due to this behavior, if the value in the Calculated Inventory field was less than or equal to 0.5, the value was rounded off to 0, which resulted in incorrect calculations. This issue has been resolved. Now, the calculated inventory field displays up to two decimal values. A similar change has been made to the Inventory field in the Criticality Consequence Evaluation and Criticality Calculator RBI Components. | DE107865 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, the Material Grade boxes in the records of the following families contained incorrect values:
This issue has been resolved. Now, the correct values appear in the Material Grade boxes, as specified in the following table.
| DE96435 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI Criticality Analysis for a Heat Exchanger Bundle component, the values in the following drop-down list boxes were not translated:
| DE94111 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when creating a What-If Analysis, the Long Term Avg. Corr. Rate, Short Term Avg. Corr. Rate, and Controlling Corrosion Rate fields in the Criticality Calculator Internal Corrosion Degradation Mechanism were not populated with the calculated values from the Thickness Monitoring module. This issue has been resolved. | DE86408 |
RBI 581
Release Date: September 27, 2019
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To enhance usability of the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 581 Data Loader, the following values are now updated in the Interface Log record generated by the data loader:
| US366675 | ||||||||||
To enhance usability, in the RBI Recommendation, the value in the RBI Recommendation Methodology field has been changed from RBI 581 Recommendation to RBI 581. | US353694 | ||||||||||
To enhance usability when using a UOM conversion set, the values within numeric fields are rounded off according to the type of the numeric field as follows:
| US352458 | ||||||||||
The properties of the following representative fluids that are valid for RBI 581 Risk Analysis have been updated as per the API 581 3rd Edition, Addendum 1 specification:
| US349921 | ||||||||||
You can now generate recommendations irrespective of the value in the Inspection Will Mitigate field. To facilitate this enhancement, the Inspection Will Mitigate check has been removed from the following module workflow policies:
| US343660 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, in an RBI 581 Analysis, when the Representative Fluid field was changed to a fluid with ambient state other than Liquid or Gas, the Release Fluid Phase field was not cleared. This issue has been resolved. | DE112859 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 581 Data Loader template, in the RBI_581_Consequence worksheet, the Consequence field contained the default value RBI. Due to this, an error occurred when importing data using the data loader. Now, the default value in the Consequence field has been changed to RBI Consequence. Note: The error message that appears when importing data using the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 581 Data Loader that contains an invalid value in the Consequence field has now been updated to include the invalid value and the associated Analysis ID. | DE111087 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, if you selected a fluid in the Representative Fluid box that did not have a value in any of the following tables, the analysis calculation failed:
This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, the analysis calculation proceeds considering the constant values as 0. | DE103262 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, the Material Grade boxes in the records of the following families contained incorrect values:
This issue has been resolved. Now, the correct values appear in the Material Grade boxes, as specified in the following table.
| DE96435 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, if the Insulated check box was selected, you could not generate RBI Recommendations for the RBI 581 Risk Analyses with the following degradation mechanisms:
| DE82239 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, if you selected a Toxic fluid in the Representative Fluid field, the application did not calculate the Weighted Component Damage Consequence and Weighted Personnel Injury Consequence even if the fluid had a value in the following tables:
| US337384 |
Release Date: July 26, 2019
Note | Tracking ID(s) |
---|---|
Previously, the formula for calculating the Expected Metal Loss Fraction (Art) for components with or without cladding or weld overlay did not adhere to API RBI 3rd Edition Addendum 1. This issue has been resolved. | DE113180 |
Previously, irrespective of the Unit of Measure (UOM) Conversion Set configured for your user account, the Consequence of Failure and Risk Values on the RBI 581 ISO-Risk Plot appeared in imperial units. This issue has been resolved. | DE113033 |