Second Quarter of 2024
Release Date: June 21, 2024
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
RBI 580 and RBI 581
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| To improve the performance of the RBI Process Unit workspace, the RBI tree has been optimized to load the first 500 RBI Assets or Corrosion Loops linked to the Process Unit. To view additional records, you can select the Load More Assets or Load More Corrosion Loop option that appears at the bottom of the tree. | 547120 |
You can now view Risk by Degradation Mechanism from the RBI Asset Overview page. To facilitate this enhancement, a new section, Degradation Mechanism Risk Overview, has been added to the RBI Asset workspace and will display the results of one of the following new catalog items:
| 365606 |
| To improve usability, you can now navigate to the Asset Health Manager module for an asset from the RBI Asset Overview and RBI Inspection Plan workspace. To facilitate this enhancement, a new hyperlink, Asset Health Manager, has been added to the Asset Info Summary. | 365092 |
| You can now view the RBI Component associated with an Inspection Confidence Evaluation when accessing the Inspection History of a Degradation Mechanism. | 261532 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, the performance was slow when loading the RBI Analysis page if the page contained calculated analyses from the RBI Asset or the Corrosion Loop workspace. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the queries related to the risk assessment of an RBI Analysis have been optimized. This issue has been resolved. | 541386 |
| Previously, the Degradation Mechanism field in a Potential Degradation Mechanism record was not set as a required field. As a result, if you did not enter a value in the field, you could not complete the RBI workflow. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the Degradation Mechanism field is a required field. | 504194 |
| Previously, you could not modify Alternative Inspection Plans if an Inspection Task linked to a child Inspection Plan Detail record was deleted. This issue has been resolved. Now, when an Inspection Task is deleted, the Inspection Task check box for related Inspection Plan Detail records is cleared and the parent Alternative Inspection Plan can be edited. | 504055 |
| Previously, in the Recommended Actions pane in the Inspection Plan page, when you selected the link in the Source box for a consolidated Recommendation, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you select the source hyperlink, you are navigated to the RBI Asset of the consolidated Recommendation. | 357461 |
RBI 581
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| The Asset Outage Multiplier field in the RBI 581 Consequence Evaluation family has been updated to Outage Multiplier. | 365256 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with a 581-Atmospheric Tank Bottom Corrosion Damage Mechanism, if the Selected Base Material Corrosion Rate field was set to Calculated and the AST Pad field was set to Continuous Concrete, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. The RBI 581 Risk Analysis is now calculated successfully. In addition, a validation message has been added when the Operating Temperature is blank for a 581-Atmospheric Tank Bottom Corrosion Degradation Mechanism Evaluation when the Selected Base Material Corrosion field contains the value Calculated. Note: This change will impact the calculation of the calculated corrosion rate for a 581-Atmospheric Tank Bottom Corrosion Degradation Mechanism. | 417362 |
Release Date: April 5, 2024
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
RBI 580 and RBI 581
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
To enhance usability, you can now save result grid column preferences in more workspaces and sections. To facilitate this enhancement, advanced settings are enabled for these result grids:
| US615105 |
| To enhance usability, when linking an RBI Recommendation to an existing Inspection Task, the Task Details field value in the Inspection Task is now appended with the Recommended Inspection Scope field value in the RBI Recommendation (instead of overwriting the value). Note: The Task Details value will not be updated if you unlink an RBI Recommendation from an Inspection Task. | US614166 |
| To enhance usability, filter options selected in the RBI Tree are now saved and applied to all assets and units for the user. To facilitate this enhancement, filter options are saved as a user preference and are applied to the RBI Tree when the user opens an asset or unit in the RBI Asset or the RBI Process Unit workspace. Note: The Show All Assets filter displayed in the asset view of the Process Unit tree is not saved as a user preference. | US611024 |
To enhance usability, for an RBI analysis, the Calculate icon color now changes to orange if calculation is required in the following scenarios:
| F74197 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, when you attempted to implement the RBI Recommendation to an Inspection Task from the RBI Inspection Plan page, the Desired Interval Basis field was not populated. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Desired Interval Basis field value is populated based on the RBI Recommendation Methodology. | DE212588 |
| Previously, the Risk Based Inspection Overview page failed to load sometimes due to a performance issue in the Inspection/TM Updates section. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the following query has been enhanced to provide better performance: Public\Meridium\Modules\Risk Based Inspection\Queries\Inspections More Current Than All Analysis | DE212439 |
| Previously, active analyses were not displayed in the RBI tree if they were what-if analyses and the Include What-If filter was not selected. This issue has been resolved. Now, active What-If analyses are displayed in the RBI Tree regardless of the Include What-If filter option selection. | DE211551 |
| Previously, the Consequence Evaluation section in the RBI Analysis workspace did not expand correctly after collapsing the section. This issue has been resolved. | DE210816 |
| Previously, the Component ID field was erroneously copied when duplicating or applying an RBI Analysis with the Copy Recommendation for Degradation Mechanisms option selected. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Component ID field on the newly created analysis will be set correctly based on the parent RBI Component. | DE210293 |
| Previously, sometimes, the Inspection Plan link in the header of the RBI Analysis workspace did not work. This issue has been resolved. Now, the link always directs you to the Inspection Plan workspace. | DE210009 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| In the Recommended Actions section in the Inspection Plan page, if you select the link in the Source box for a consolidated Recommendation, an error occurs because the consolidated Recommendation is linked to the asset instead of the analysis. Workaround: After you select the link in the Source box, the RBI Asset page appears; you can then select the asset from the RBI Tree in the left pane. | DE213947 |
RBI 581
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| To enhance usability, you can now create or update RBI 581 Mechanical Fatigue Damage Evaluation records using the RBI 581 Data Loader. To facilitate this enhancement, a new worksheet named DME_MechanicalFatigue has been added to the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 581.xlsx worksheet. Note: All the field values in DME_MechanicalFatigue worksheet should be of data type character because they are System Code Table IDs. | US616583 |
| You can now export 581- Mechanical Fatigue Degradation Mechanism Evaluations linked to RBI 581 Risk Analyses from the RBI Analysis Export workspace. | US613282 |
| You can now choose to hide the financial risk on the risk card in the RBI 581 Risk Analysis workspace for components types other than the Storage Tank Bottom. To facilitate this enhancement, a new preference named Hide Financial Risk on RBI Risk Card is added to the RBI Admin Preferences page. | US611031 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| Previously, if the Description field of an RBI Component contained a value greater than 250 characters, when you attempted to copy an RBI 581 Risk Analysis or generate Recommendations for the analysis, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | DE213100 |
| Previously, an error was displayed when duplicating or applying an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with the Copy Recommendation for Degradation Mechanisms option selected and the Cost Escalation field on the linked Consequence Evaluation was empty. This issue has been resolved. | DE211414 |
| Previously, if you used calculated corrosion rate for a 581-Hydrofluoric Acid Corrosion Degradation Mechanism, the corrosion rate was calculated incorrectly for the Alloy 400 Base Material, if the HF Concentration field was between 63-64% or Operating Temperature is between 175-200 Fahrenheit. The issue has been resolved. | DE209631 |
| Previously, when creating an Inspection with the Task Type field set to RBI581 Non-Intrusive and Extent field set to 35% UT SCAN or 35% RT, the Inspection Confidence was automatically set to C- FAIRLY. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can select 35% UT SCAN or 35% RT (C) or 35% UT SCAN or 35% RT (D) for the Extent field to determine the Inspection Confidence. | DE208165 |
| Previously, the Base Material Calculated Rate field in an RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation was not updated when the related RBI 581 Risk Analysis was calculated. To ensure that updated calculation inputs are considered for calculation, now, if the Selected External Corrosion Rate field in an RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation is set to Calculated, the Base Material Calculated Rate field is populated when the related RBI 581 Risk Analysis is calculated. To facilitate this enhancement, the Base Material Calculated Rate is not populated until the RBI 581 Risk Analysis is calculated. | DE149252 |
| Description | Tracking ID |
|---|---|
| If you attempt to create an Inventory Group with an existing name, the error message that appears states that the value you have entered is not valid instead of stating that the group name already exists. | DE213820 |