Third Quarter of 2020
Release Date: September 25, 2020
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
RBI 580 and 581
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now implement recommended actions from multiple Inspection Plans to existing Inspection Tasks. To facilitate this enhancement, in the Inspection Plan Management workspace, in the Inspection Plans section, the Link Existing option has been added to the Implement menu. Note: The tasks to link are selected based on the task type of the recommended action and the linked asset. | US340978 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, creating or copying an RBI analysis was failing for an Asset where the Source of Corrosion Rate was either Asset or Component and the Asset had large number of TMLs. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can go to Thickness Monitoring module and calculate the corrosion analysis before creating or copying an RBI Analysis, if the Asset has more than 1000 TMLs and the Asset Corrosion Analysis has not been calculated. | US427530 |
Previously, the security group MI Inspection Viewer did not have the permissions to view the Inspection Recommendation family. This issue has been resolved. | DE135150 |
Previously, in the Asset Hierarchy, when you selected an asset, and then selected the Integrity tab, the link for Risk Based Inspection took longer to load, depending on the number of assets in the Asset Hierarchy. This issue has been resolved. | DE132867 |
Previously, when you bulk calculated RBI 580 or RBI 581 analyses from the Unit Overview or the Corrosion Loop Overview section, the Analyses Calculation window displayed an incorrect value for the number of analyses calculated, and the percentage in the progress bar. This issue has been resolved. | DE132615 |
Previously, in the Recommendation pane, the target completion date did not appear in the format based on your culture settings. This issue has been resolved. | DE132189 |
RBI 580
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
With Inspection Grouping, you can now perform inspection on a subset of equipment in a group rather than on every piece of equipment in that group. Inspection Groups are created for two damage mechanisms, that is, for Internal Corrosion and External Corrosion. The primary criteria for selecting equipment for inspection are but not limited to the following:
This feature provides the following functionalities to optimize an inspection:
Note: Existing Inspection Groups that were created in APM V3.x will be visible in the page containing the Inspection Groups. It is recommended that you re-create the Inspection Groups. | F48217 | ||||||||
You can now view the risk for the current interval on RBI PRD Criticality Analyses, Leak Degradation Mechanism Evaluations, and Over Pressure Degradation Mechanism Evaluations. The current interval is defined as the difference between the current calculation date and the Next Inspection Date field on the RBI PRD Criticality Analysis family. To facilitate this enhancement, the Next Inspection Date field is now a required field whether the RBI PRD Criticality Analysis protects components or assets. In addition, the following fields have been added to store the results of the calculation at the current interval:
| US416909 | ||||||||
You can now override the Recommended Interval field in Recommended Actions that are generated for RBI PRD Criticality Analyses by clearing the Use Calculated Data check box on the related Inspection Strategy datasheet. When the Use Calculated Data field is set to false, the Recommended Interval field will be set to the Recommended Inspection Interval field from the Inspection Strategy record. | US415572 | ||||||||
You can now copy an RBI PRD Criticality Analysis. To facilitate this enhancement, the Duplicate option has been added to the Analysis Overview workspace and the Component Overview workspace. | US414072 | ||||||||
To improve performance, the following queries have been modified to retrieve the ENTY_ID from the Equipment or Asset Hierarchy instead of the MI_ENTITIES table of the database:
| US398209 | ||||||||
You can now create a What-If Analysis from an RBI Criticality Analysis in the active state. To facilitate this enhancement, the Create What-If option is now enabled on the RBI Component Overview workspace and the RBI Analysis workspace for the RBI Criticality Analyses that are in the active state. | US385170 | ||||||||
To enhance usability, the #urlnotsupported tag has been removed from the URL column in the associated pages tab from the following two RBI families:
| US382352 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, Inventory was not calculated correctly for an RBI Component when Initial Fluid Phase was Gas. This issue has been resolved. | DE138184 |
Previously, the fields Operation Pressure – Channel Side and Operating Temperature – Channel Side on RBI Criticality Analysis had a default value of zero pounds force per square inch and zero degrees Fahrenheit respectively. This resulted in negative values for users assigned to the metric UOM Conversion Set. This issue has been resolved. Now, there is no default value assigned for the fields Operation Pressure – Channel Side and Operating Temperature – Channel Side. | DE133049 |
Previously, when the Allowable Stress Override check box was not selected, you could not calculate the RBI Criticality Analysis without specifying a value in the Material Grade box. However, for certain Material Specifications, the Material Grade is not required to populate the value in the Allowable Stress field for calculating the RBI Criticality Analysis. This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, the Material Grade is not required when calculating the RBI Criticality Analysis. | DE132255 |
Previously, the Representative Fluid field in RBI Criticality Analysis was incorrectly mapped from the Process Fluid field value in the Technical Data - Shell Side section in the RBI Comp - Exchanger Bundle datasheet of the related RBI Component. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Representative Fluid field is not populated by default in the RBI Criticality Analysis, when the related RBI Component is Criticality RBI Component – Exchanger Bundle. | DE126274 |
RBI 581
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with an RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluation or an RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluation, the value in the Date in Service field was used to calculate the age on Planned Date with Inspection if the Last Known Inspection Date field was not set. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Target Inspection Date field is used to calculate the age on Planned Date with Inspection regardless of whether the Last Known Inspection Date field is set for RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluations and RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluations. | US414062 | ||||||
The following fields in the Risk Based Inspection 581 Consequence Evaluation family will now be displayed in Kilograms per Second for users assigned with the Metric Unit of Measure conversion set.
| US403046 | ||||||
RBI 581 Analyses now allow AST Shell calculations for Component Type field value set to Storage Tank. To facilitate this change, the following fields in the RBI 581 Consequence Evaluation family are now enabled if the Component Type field is set to Storage Tank, regardless of the related RBI Component family:
| US401540 | ||||||
To improve performance, the following queries have been modified to retrieve the ENTY_ID from the Equipment or Asset Hierarchy instead of the MI_ENTITIES table of the database:
| US398209 | ||||||
You can now create a What-If Analysis from an RBI 581 Risk Analysis in the active state. To facilitate this enhancement, the Create What-If option is now enabled on the RBI Component Overview workspace and the RBI Analysis workspace for the RBI 581 Risk Analyses that are in the active state. | US385170 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, the SHE Risk Category was incorrectly set to Low on the RBI 581 Risk Analyses related to the Storage Tank Bottom components. This issue has been resolved. Now, the SHE Risk Category will always be blank on the RBI 581 Risk Analyses related to the Storage Tank Bottom components. | DE140734 |
Previously, when the Online Monitoring field was set to Yes (Y) on the 581-Internal Component Lining Damage, a Damage Mechanism Evaluation, the Online Monitoring Adjustment was incorrectly set as 0.01. This affected the calculated Damage Factor field. This issue has been resolved. Now, as per the API 581, 3rd edition specification, the Online Monitoring Adjustment is set to 0.1 when the Online Monitoring field is set to Yes (Y) on the 581-Internal Component Lining Damage a Damage Mechanism Evaluation. | DE139034 |
Previously, the Calculated T-min field in the 581 Risk Analyses was incorrectly calculated when the Geometry Type field value was Piping. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Calculated T-min field is calculated using the formula from the reference ASME B31.3, 2014 Edition. For more information on the formula, refer to KBA 000036403. | DE137299 |
Previously, when calculating RBI 581 Analysis for an AST Shell component on an Oracle database where toxic fluid was set to ALCL3, an error occurred and the calculation failed. This issue has been resolved. | DE137248 |
Previously, the Mapped RBI Component (MIR_MTORBIC) relationship family did not have a baseline business rule. Due to this, when you attempted to inherit the Library.Baseline.MIR_MTORBIC.MIR_MTORBIC rule in your custom project, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | DE133994 |
Previously, when the Allowable Stress Override check box was not selected, you could not calculate an RBI 581 Risk Analysis linked to RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Evaluation or RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation without specifying a value in the Material Grade box. However, for certain Material Specifications, the Material Grade is not required to populate the value in the Allowable Stress field for calculating the RBI Criticality Analysis. This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, if the Allowable Stress and Flow Stress fields contain a value, the Material Grade is not required when calculating the RBI Criticality Analysis. | DE132255 |