Fourth Quarter of 2022
Release Date: December 13, 2022
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
To enhance usability, the MIExecutionService is now available in the APM server. It processes jobs in the Inspection Management, Integrity Mobile, Risk Based Inspection, and Thickness Monitoring module queues. The MIExecutionService uses a single shared ActiveMQ queue service across APM. | US554741 |
To improve usability, you can now view the Inspection Task datasheet in a Datasheet window instead of a new tab, when you select the Task ID hyperlink in the existing tasks section of the Inspection Plan page. | US547779 |
To enhance usability, the Suggest Potential Degradation Mechanisms (PDMs) feature has been introduced. This feature provides the following functionalities:
To facilitate this enhancement, select the Enable Suggestion of Potential Degradation Mechanism option in the RBI Admin Preferences workspace. For more information on modifying the policy, refer to KBA 000039240. | US519095 |
To improve usability, you can now view the Asset info summary in the RBI Asset View page. To facilitate this enhancement, a new button ![]()
| US518766 |
Risk Based Inspection pages have been enhanced to improve usability:
|
|
When creating an RBI Component from the Asset Summary or Unit Summary workspace, the Component Types in the Component Type drop-down list are now populated based on the Component Family selected in the Create New RBI Component window. To facilitate this enhancement, a new system code table, MI RBI COMPONENT FAMILIES, has been added to the System Codes and Tables page. The system code table contains the Component Families and the supported Component Types associated with the MI RBI COMPONENT TYPES system code table. Note: For more information on the baseline Component Families and the Component Types that are supported for each Component Family, refer to the MI RBI COMPONENT FAMILIES System Code Table topic. | US446310 |
To improve usability, the following changes have been made to the Component:<name> workspace:
| US446303 |
To improve usability, the Potential Degradation Mechanisms tab has been removed from the Corrosion Loop: <name> workspace. You can now select the Corrosion Loop Details tab, and then expand the POTENTIAL DEGRADATION MECHANISMS sub-section to view the list of Potential Degradation Mechanisms (PDMs) that are linked to a Corrosion Loop. | US443994 |
To improve usability, the following changes have been made to the left pane tree navigation for RBI Asset and RBI Process Unit:
| US443991 |
To enhance usability, a new inspection planning methodology, Alternative Inspection Plan, has been introduced. Using this feature, you can perform the following functionalities:
To facilitate this enhancement, enable the Alternative Inspection Plan option from the application settings. Note: This is an optional functionality. The Alternative Inspection Plan does not support the following workflows:
| US528269 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, the Desired Interval Basis field on Inspection Tasks implemented from Risk Based Inspection was set to RBI Recommendation or RBI 581 Recommendation. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Desired Interval Basis field on Inspection Tasks implemented from Risk Based Inspection is set to RBI 580 or RBI 581 respectively. The Desired Interval Basis field on Inspection Tasks implemented from manually created Inspection Plan Details is set as User Designed. | US537338 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when searching for Potential Degradation Mechanisms from the Component Overview section or the Corrosion Loop Overview section, previously selected Potential Degradation Mechanisms were not retained. This issue has been resolved. | US439611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when you accessed an RBI Component, the analysis table in the Component Overview section sometimes failed to load, resulting in a blank screen. You had to refresh the browser to view the related analyses. This issue has been resolved. | DE189291 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when you attempted to delete an RBI Analysis, there was no indication that the delete process had started, and you selected the Delete icon multiple times, resulting in an error. This issue has been resolved. Now, a busy cursor is displayed when you select Delete on an RBI Analysis. | DE183466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when you attempted to link the protected components to a Pressure Relief Device component on a Corrosion Loop, components which were not eligible to be linked were displayed in the list. This issue has been resolved. | DE154170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, when the RBI Evergreening Preference was set to RBI 581, hyperlinks for the Asset ID, Component, and Analysis ID columns in the Pending Evergreening tab of the RBI Bulk Evergreening workspace were not displayed. This issue has been resolved. | DE152646 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, the RBI Corrosion Loop table in the Unit Summary workspace took a long time to load. Now, performance improvements have been made to reduce the time to load the table. | DE141412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previously, the field captions of the following family fields contained extra spaces, special characters, or spelling mistakes. This issue has been resolved. Now, the field captions have been corrected to the captions listed in the following table.
| DE101745 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
You can now update What-If RBI 581 Risk Analyses using the RBI 581 Data Loader. To facilitate this enhancement, the RBI 581 Data Loader template is updated to include the Event Type column on the RBI 581 Analysis worksheet and all Consequence Evaluation, Degradation Mechanism Evaluation, and Damage Mechanism worksheets. When the Event Type is set to W, the system updates the analysis with the matching Analysis Unique Identifier. Note: If the What-If Analysis does not exist, an error appears, indicating that the What-If Analysis cannot be created using data loaders. | US554368 | ||||||
To improve usability, the following changes have been made in the RBI 581 ISO Risk Plot page:
| US533000 | ||||||
You can now view the risk calculated on the Target Inspection Date. To facilitate this enhancement, the following changes have been made:
| US528300 | ||||||
To improve usability, RBI Analysts, can now manage Inventory Groups. To facilitate this enhancement, the Inventory Groups workspace has been moved from the RBI Admin Preferences page to the Risk Based Inspection workspace. It is accessible from the RBI Component workspace and also from the Risk Based Inspection Overview workspace. | US518223 | ||||||
You can now export RBI Criticality Analyses to an excel format from either of the below workspaces:
The exported file will be in the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader template format. This will provide the ability to modify the exported analysis data and re-import for easy bulk editing. To facilitate this enhancement, Export Analyses feature has been introduced. | US450061 | ||||||
The Final Damage Factor for RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluations now adheres to API 581 3rd Edition, Addendum 1. The Final Damage Factor will now have a maximum value of 5000. | US470511 | ||||||
You can now correctly reference the RBI Component and Equipment of an RBI 581 Risk Analysis and its related RBI Degradation Mechanisms that are related to from their respective datasheets after applying or copying the analysis. To facilitate this enhancement, the following fields have been updated to match the Component and Equipment you are applying or copying to.
| US453121 | ||||||
You can now select the field displaying the Total SHE Risk – RBI Date, SHE Risk Category – RBI Date, and Total Financial Risk – RBI Date data in the page heading to view the RBI 581 ISO Risk Plot and the default Risk Matrix. To facilitate this enhancement, the Risk Matrix section has been removed from the Asset Summary workspace for RBI 581 Risk Analyses. |
US530725 US443989 | ||||||
The Final Damage Factor for RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluations now adheres to API 581 3rd Edition, Addendum 1. The Final Damage Factor will now have a maximum value of 5000. | US439316 | ||||||
The Coefficient Y Material field in the RBI 581 Risk Analysis is now localized. To facilitate this enhancement, the RBI 581 Coefficient Y Materials List system code table will be used to populate the values for the Coefficient Y Material field in the RBI 581 Risk Analysis. | US351000 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, the Deg Mech Comments field was disabled in Degradation Mechanism Details page when the RBI 581 Risk Analysis was set to Created state. Now, you are allowed to enter the comments in the Deg Mech Comments field until the RBI 581 Risk Analysis is set to Complete state. This issue has been resolved. | DE192230 |
Previously, when the Operating Temperature field of an RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation was greater than 90 degrees Fahrenheit, the Calculated Corrosion Rate field was not set to the most conservative value from Table 15.2 (Corrosion Rates for Calculation of the DF-External Corrosion) of the RBI 581 Specification. This issue has been resolved. | DE190649 |
Previously, when you attempted to calculate an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with a Representative Fluid that satisfied the following conditions, an error occurred:
| DE189199 |
Previously, the susceptibility calculations for the 581-Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking degradation mechanism evaluation were not updated as per API 581 Specification, Third Edition. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the RBI 581 Calculate Susceptibility - CISCC policy has been updated. For information, refer to KBA 000039983. | DE188760 |
Previously, when the Operating Temperature field of an RBI 581 Risk Analysis was set to a value 100, 200 or greater than 300 degrees Fahrenheit, the Cracking Susceptibility field was calculated incorrectly on the 581-Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking degradation mechanism evaluations. This issue has been resolved. | DE188760 |
Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with a 581-Atmospheric Tank Bottom Corrosion degradation mechanism evaluation where the Highest Effective Inspection Level field is set to Highly Effective, the Recommended Inspection Effectiveness field on the related Damage Mechanism was not set. This resulted in no recommendations being generated. This issue has been resolved. Now, the system will attempt mitigation on 581-Atmospheric Tank Bottom Corrosion degradation mechanism evaluations regardless of the highest effective inspection level. | DE187364 |
Previously, when you created an RBI 581 Admin option from the RBI 581 Admin Options workspace and switched between tabs, the newly created option did not appear on the page. This issue has been resolved. | DE183593 |
Previously, when calculating a Thinning and Lining Damage Mechanism Evaluation where the Cladding field was set to true in the parent RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the Expected Metal Loss Fraction (Art) field was calculated using the incorrect cladding corrosion rate based on the Selected Base Material Corrosion Rate field. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Expected Metal Loss Fraction (Art) field is calculated using the cladding corrosion rate based on the Selected Cladding Material Corrosion Rate field. | DE181240 |
Previously, when you calculated an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with a related 581-Internal Component Lining Damage degradation mechanism, the damage factor was set to Zero if the age was less than 0.5. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the age is less than 0.5, the Damage Factor is populated based on the updated content in the following tables:
| DE179908 |
Previously, as a multiple site user, when you created an RBI 581 Inventory group, the site was set based on the user’s default site instead of the Process Units site. This issue has been resolved. Now, a newly created RBI 581 Inventory Groups site is set based on the Process Units site. | DE179048 |
Previously, in the RBI 581 Admin Options workspace under the RBI Admin Preferences page, the Character Field Value drop-down list was not populated for some of the Target Family and Target Field combinations. This issue has been resolved. | DE178900 |
Previously, when you navigated to the Inventory Groups workspace from the Unit Summary workspace, the Create New Group button (![]() | DE176641 |
Previously, when you logged in with the MI RBI Viewer permissions, the Link ( | DE175357 |
Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with a toxic mixture, if one of the following values was selected in the Toxic Model field, the Weighted Toxic Consequence Area field on the related RBI 581 Consequence Evaluation was calculated incorrectly using release mass:
This issue has been resolved. Now, in this scenario, the Weighted Toxic Consequence Area field considers the release rate. For more information access the KBA 000037566. | DE155372 |
Previously, when you attempted to execute the RBI 581 Dataloader, if the value provided in the fields on the Analysis, Consequence Evaluation, or Degradation Mechanism Evaluation sheets were null, the field value was updated as null. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the value provided for the fields are null, the field is skipped and the default value or any mapped value is displayed. | DE154518 |
Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis that had the Component Type set to Storage Tank and a related RBI 581 Thinning Degradation Mechanism Evaluation or RBI 581 External Degradation Mechanism Evaluation, the Strength Ratio field was calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | DE152192 |
Previously, if an RBI 581 Risk Analysis was linked to an RBI Component with the component type set to Air Cooled Exchanger Tubes, the recommendations were erroneously generated. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the below two baseline queries are updated:
| DE152190 |
Previously, the Calculated T-min field on 581 Risk Analyses was calculated incorrectly when Geometry Type field value was Piping. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Calculated T-min field on 581 Risk Analyses is calculated using the formula from the reference, ASME B31.3, 2014 Edition. For more information about the formula, refer to KBA 000036403. | DE151334 |
Previously, when calculating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the Final Damage Factor field for the RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Evaluation family was incorrectly calculated in the following scenarios:
| DE150440 |
Previously, the Calculated T-min field on 581 Risk Analyses was calculated incorrectly when Geometry Type field value was Spherical Head or Hemispherical Head. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Calculated T-min field on 581 Risk Analyses is calculated using the updated formula. For more information about the formula, refer to KBA 000037009. | DE149068 |
Previously, when duplicating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, when at least one related Degradation Mechanism was not selected, an error occurred, and the RBI 581 Risk Analysis was not copied. This issue has been resolved. | DE145892 |
Previously, if the PV Stress or Piping Stress reference tables contained multiple records with the same combination of Design Code, Code Year, Material Specification, Material Grade and Metal Temperature, the Allowable stress and Flow stress fields in 581 Risk Analysis were populated arbitrarily with one of the records returned for each field. This issue has been resolved. Now, the record with the lowest Allowable stress value from the records returned is used to populate the Allowable Stress and Flow stress fields. | DE145435 |
Previously, in the picklist tab of RBI 581 data loader template, the following process fluids were not available:
This issue has been resolved. | DE145420 |
Previously when you implemented RBI 581 Recommended Actions to existing Inspection Tasks in bulk, the data for the Recommended Inspection Task appeared only for the first Recommended Action. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Recommended Inspection Task data appears for each Recommended Action. | DE144641 |
Previously, if the Design Temperature value was less than the minimum value of Metal Temperature in the Piping Stress or PV Stress table records, the Allowable Stress and Flow Stress fields in 581 Risk Analysis were calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the Design Temperature value is less than the minimum value of Metal Temperature, then the Allowable Stress and Flow Stress fields are calculated based on the minimum value of Metal Temperature. | DE84703 |
Previously, when creating an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the Measured External Corrosion Rate field in the RBI Component family was not mapped to the Base Material Measured Rate field in the related RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation family. This issue has been resolved. | DE83359 |
Previously, when you calculated an RBI 581 Risk Analysis with Component Type set to Storage Tank Bottom, the Base Damage Factor on RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Datasheet was not retrieving the most conservative value from Thinning Damage Factors of the AST Bottom table in the API 581 Specification. This issue has been resolved. For more information, refer to KBA 000038729. | DE83086 |
Release Date: November 18, 2022
This topic provides a list of product changes released for this module on this date.
RBI 581
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when the Operating Temperature field of an RBI 581 External Damage Evaluation was greater than 90 degrees Fahrenheit, the Calculated Corrosion Rate field was not set to the most conservative value from Table 15.2 (Corrosion Rates for Calculation of the DF-External Corrosion) of the RBI 581 Specification. This issue has been resolved. | DE190815 |